LAUSR

In this article, we report that there were no differences in rates of acute kidney injury between trough-based vancomycin dosing and AUC/MIC-based vancomycin dosing across 12 hospitals. AUC/MIC dosing resulted in more vancomycin lab draws during standard lab draw times compared to trough dosing, thus making it more convenient for health care personnel. ABSTRACT Vancomycin is used for Gram-positive infections, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The 2020 vancomycin guidelines described by M. J. Rybak, J. Le, T. P. Lodise, D. P. Levine, et al. (Am J Health Syst Pharm 77:835–864, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaa036) provided an update on vancomycin dosing, which recommended an optimal area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h to MIC (AUC/MIC) target of 400 to 600. In 2021, a pharmacy-driven AUC/MIC vancomycin dosing protocol was implemented across 12 Sentara Health System hospitals. The primary objective of this study was to assess if the pharmacy-driven AUC/MIC vancomycin dosing protocol led to fewer acute kidney injury (AKI) events than trough-based dosing. Secondary objectives included vancomycin duration, hospital length of stay, administered vancomycin dose during admission, vancomycin labs drawn during standard lab times, and cost. AKI was assessed in two separate ways: (i) modified AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network) criteria and (ii) a modified version from the vancomycin guidelines. Inferential statistics were used to analyze the results of this retrospective study. Per the AKIN definition, the rates of AKI were 13.9% (349/2,507) in the trough-based group and 14.9% (369/2,471) in the AUC/MIC-based group (P = 0.309). Per the definition of the vancomycin guidelines, the rates of AKI were 6.7% (169/2,507) in the trough-based group and 7.6% (187/2,471) in the AUC/MIC-based group (P = 0.258). A total of 52% (2,679/5,151) of vancomycin labs were obtained during standard lab times in the AUC group and 24% (1,144/4,766) in the trough group (P < 0.05). There was no difference in AKI events between AUC and trough dosing. Use of contrast dye may confound these results. AUC/MIC dosing was associated with more lab draws during standard times, a larger number of labs drawn per person, and less total use of vancomycin. IMPORTANCE In this article, we report that there were no differences in rates of acute kidney injury between trough-based vancomycin dosing and AUC/MIC-based vancomycin dosing across 12 hospitals. AUC/MIC dosing resulted in more vancomycin lab draws during standard lab draw times compared to trough dosing, thus making it more convenient for health care personnel. This study includes all uses for vancomycin, including empirical use, and all patient severity levels. Therefore, this research reflects real-world use of vancomycin in hospitals. AUC/MIC dosing is supported by various infectious disease societies. However, the feasibility of incorporating AUC/MIC dosing in hospitals is undetermined. This study is unique in that it includes hospitals of various sizes (small community hospitals and an academic teaching hospital), and it includes a feasibility component. Therefore, this study has broad applicability to other hospitals across the United States. This original research includes the clinical application of vancomycin in a multicenter health system.