LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

THU0419 Association of inflammatory markers c-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation ratewith pulmonary function tests and european scleroderma study group activity index (ESCSG-AI) in systemic sclerosis – associated interstitial lung disease in follow up study

Photo from wikipedia

Background inflammatory markers are very important to assess severity and activity of SSc-ILD, but it’s role needs further investigation. Objectives to assess inflammatory markers of SSc such as hsCRP and… Click to show full abstract

Background inflammatory markers are very important to assess severity and activity of SSc-ILD, but it’s role needs further investigation. Objectives to assess inflammatory markers of SSc such as hsCRP and ESR and compare with lung function test and EScSG-AI in the long-term follow up study. Methods It was a longitudinal study involving 77 pts with SSc-ILD (mean age was 46,2±13,4; 69% have limited subset of the disease; 93% were female). The mean duration of follow up was 58,9±11,4 months. Pts. were investigated with HRCT twice (at first visit and at the end of the study) and according the CT-changes were divided into 3 groups: the 1st group (16 pts) with improvement; 2nd group (39 pts) without any changes and 3rd group (22 pts) with worsening of fibrosis. Other data collected including biological results (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)), PFT (forced vital capacity (FVC,% of predicted) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO,% of predicted), composite score (EScSG-AI). Results there were no significant differences between groups related to sex, frequency of diffuse form and duration disease. Mean levels of hsCRP and ESR didn’t change significantly during the follow up. In all pts the mean levels of hsCRP and ESR correlated directly with each other at first visit and at the end of the study (R=0,45 and R=0,4 (p<0,001) accordingly. We compared the mean levels of hsCRP and ESR with mean dates of FVC, DLCO and EScSG-AI score in first visit and the end of follow up. Mean levels of hsCRP inversely correlated with mean dates of DLCO at the first visit and at the end of the study (R=-0,39 and R=-0,42 (p<0,05) accordingly); in groups 2 and 3 (R=-0,34 and R=-0,47 (p<0,05) accordingly) at the end of the study; with mean dates of FVC in all pts and group 2 (R=-0,42 and R=0,47 (p<0,05) accordingly) only at the end of the study; correlated directly with EScSG-AI score in all pts and groups 2,3 (R=0,58 (p<0,0001), R=0,46 (p<0,01) and R=0,77 (p<0,001) accordingly) at the end of the study. While mean levels of ESR inversely correlated with mean dates of DLCO only in all pts and groups 1,2 (R=-0,43, R=-0,66 and R=-0,39 (p<0,05) accordingly) at first visit; correlated directly with EScSG-AI score in all pts. (R=0309 (p<0,01) at the end of the study. Mean levels of hsCRP inversely correlated with DLCO, FVC and directly correlated with EScSG-AI and these correlations were more evident than with mean levels of ESR. Conclusions In our group of pts. the hsCRP has proven to be an accurate reflection of disease severity especially in pts with progression of ILD. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Keywords: end study; group; disease; study; inflammatory markers; mean levels

Journal Title: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.