LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

P018 Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies as a clinical response predictor in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept

Photo from wikipedia

Career situation of first and presenting author Student for a master or a PhD. Introduction The presence of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) has been detected in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1 Anti-CarP… Click to show full abstract

Career situation of first and presenting author Student for a master or a PhD. Introduction The presence of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) has been detected in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1 Anti-CarP autoAbs target proteins that are modified through an irreversible post-translational modification named carbamylation. Objectives The aim of this work was to assess whether anti-CarP antibodies can be used as a predictive factor of clinical response to abatacept. Methods Peripheral blood samples of selected patients were collected at the beginning of the therapy with abatacept (T0) and every six months for one year (T6 and T12). A home-made ELISA was applied to determine serum anti-CarP levels. Commercial anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (anti-CCP3) (Inova Diagnostic), Rheumatoid Factor (RF) (Siemens) and high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) were also tested. Results Sixty RA patients (49 female (81.2%)), all caucasian, treated with abatacept were enrolled. Fifty-three (88.3%) and fifty-six (93.3%) patients were also treated with corticosteroids and synthetic DMARD respectively. At baseline anti-CarP antibodies were found in 18 (30%) patients; RF and anti-CCP were positive in 35 (58%) and 51 (85%) patients respectively. Comparing anti-CarP+ with anti-CarP- patients at T0, anti-CarP+ group resulted younger (p<0.01) and with a longer disease duration (p<0.05); hsCRP was higher in anti-CarP+ group (p<0.05). Considering the entire cohort, a significant reduction of anti-CarP titre at T6 and T12 of treatment was shown (p<0.0001) while anti-CCP and RF titre did not show any significant change. Thirteen out of 18 patients anti-CarP+ were available for analysis at T6 and in 6 cases turned anti-CarP-. A significant reduction of DAS28-CRP at T6 was found in the subgroup of anti-CarP+ pts in comparison with the negative ones (p=0.03). No significant results were found dividing the cohort using the positivity to anti-CCP and/or RF. Furthermore, stratifying groups of patients for the combination of biomarkers, any groups including anti-CarP+ resulted in a trend towards a higher DAS28 reduction compared with the combination of anti-CCP+ and RF+ and anti-CAP- ones. Conclusions The precocious onset and a longer disease duration in anti-CarP positive patients might suggest them as a specific risk factors for RA in this subgroup of patients. The link between the anti-CarP positivity at baseline and the higher reduction of disease activity during the first six months of treatment permitted us to hypothesize that anti-CarP antibodies, but not anti-CCP and/or RF, could be a predictive factor of a good clinical response to abatacept. Reference Shi J, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(42):17372–7. Disclosure of Interest None declared.

Keywords: anti ccp; protein antibodies; carp; clinical response; anti carp

Journal Title: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.