LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

AB0703 WHICH OF THE ASDAS OR BASDAI CORRELATES BETTER WITH PHYSICIAN GLOBAL ASSESSMENT?

Photo by cdc from unsplash

Background: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity score (ASDAS) was developed because of the limitations of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Index (BASDAI) of being totally patient-derived with limited face and construct validity.… Click to show full abstract

Background: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity score (ASDAS) was developed because of the limitations of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Index (BASDAI) of being totally patient-derived with limited face and construct validity. ASDAS includes inflammatory markers that were aimed to increase its face validity by representing a different ‘objective’ domain of disease activity that was not included in BASDAI. Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare correlation of ASDAS and BASDAI with physician global assessment (PhGA) in order to know which is more reliable. Methods: Cross-sectional study including patients with SpA according to the ASAS criteria of 2009 and/or New York modified criteria. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the C-reactive protein (crp) were measured. The disease activity was assessed by BASDAI and ASDAS. Physician global assessment (PhGA) was rated by 0–100 numeric score. We correlated disease activity indices with physician global assessment by Pearson coefficient. Results: A total of 110 patients (68 men and 42 women) with a mean age of 43.18 ±12.34 [19-79] years was collected. The mean disease duration was 5.99±2.31 [1-10] years. The mean ESR and CRP were respectively 28.41±21.51 [2-110] and 15.56 ±23.84 [0-153] mg/l. ESR was correlated with PhGA (p=0.06, r=0.300), however CRP was not correlated with PhGA (p=0.134, r=0.165). The mean ASDAS-ESR and ASDAS-CRP were respectively 2.93±1.05 [0.83-5.65] and 2.81±0.97 [0.29-4.77]. The mean BASDAI was 4.42±2.23 [0-9.2]. The mean PhGA was 5.43 ±2.31 [1-10]. The BASDAI correlated with PhGA (p=0.007, r=0.307). In addition, ASDAS-ESR and ASDAS-CRP correlated with PhGA (p=0.001, r=0.372, p=0.001, r=0.391) respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion both BASDAI and ASDAS are equal, with a superiority nonetheless for the ASDAS since it correlated stronger with PhGA. Acknowledgments: None Disclosure of Interests: None declared

Keywords: disease activity; basdai; physician global; global assessment

Journal Title: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.