LAUSR

Osteoarthritis of the knee is one of the most common joint diseases. It mainly manifests as pain and can become disabling over time. Several symptomatic therapeutic methods are used to relieve patients with knee osteoarthritis and give them more autonomy. Topical analgesics are considered as an interesting alternative for old and poly-medicated patients.The aim of this work was to assess the perception of the effectiveness of topical analgesics by patients followed for knee osteoarthritis.A prospective study has been conducted collecting 66 patients followed for knee osteoarthritis at different stages of the disease and under topical analgesic treatment. Epidemiological data, physical examination and x-ray data were collected. The impact of knee osteoarthritis was evaluated by the Lequesne and WOMAC indices. Patients were asked to evaluate their perception about: the time that makes the medication to act, the duration of action and overall satisfaction with the topical analgesic by rating it from 0 to 5. Zero represents complete dissatisfaction while 5 represents complete satisfaction. Patients were also asked about the side effects observed after the use of the topical treatment and whether they recommended this treatment to a friend or a parent.In the studied population, the majority of patients were women (87%) with an average age of 55 years. The most common comorbidities were high blood pressure (61%), diabetes (38%) and osteoporosis (36%). Sixty-nine percent of patients were taking more than two oral treatments. The average duration of development of osteoarthritis of the knee was 9 years. The most common radiological stage was stage 1 (58%). The site was femorotibial in 88% of cases, patellofemoral in 4% of cases and bi or tri compartmental in 8% of cases. The osteoarthritis most often affected both knees in 86% of cases.The average of the Lequesne index was 11. The average WOMAC index was 12 for pain, 1.5 for stiffness and 48 for dysfunction.All the patients surveyed were on topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 37.7% combined local herbal medicine with local NSAIDs, 53% were taking oral analgesics, and 19% were using oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the past month.The average rating for time that takes the topical treatment to act was 2.9, for duration of action was 1.2, and for overall satisfaction was 2.8. No adverse effects of topical treatment have been reported.For patients over 60 years old, better satisfaction was noted (the average score for overall satisfaction was 3.2).Patients with a WOMAC Pain Index greater than 10 were less satisfied (the average overall satisfaction score was 1.1). Patients who took both topical NSAIDs and topical herbal medicine reported that topical NSAIDs were more effective in 66% of cases. Forty percent of patients recommended topical treatment to a friend or a family member.In patients with chronic pain associated to osteoarthritis of the knee, topical analgesics are considered a good long-term therapeutic alternative. Patients are generally satisfied with the effectiveness of the local treatment, in particular the immediate effect felt after application, but less satisfied with the duration of action. Perception of effectiveness appears to be affected by age and degree of pain.[1]D. Y. Wall, “Topical Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Adults,” p. 3, 2017.[2]R. L. Barkin, “The Pharmacology of Topical Analgesics,” null, vol. 125, no. sup1, pp. 7–18, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1080/00325481.2013.1110566911.None declared.