LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

POS1236 IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON INITIATION AND RENEWAL OF BIOTHERAPIES AND TARGETED SYNTHETIC TREATMENTS

Photo by ries_bosch from unsplash

During the epidemic’s peak of COVID-19, scientific societies published recommendations on biotherapy and targeted synthetic treatment (B/TST) use in patients with chronic articular inflammatory diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases, and psoriasis.The… Click to show full abstract

During the epidemic’s peak of COVID-19, scientific societies published recommendations on biotherapy and targeted synthetic treatment (B/TST) use in patients with chronic articular inflammatory diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases, and psoriasis.The objective was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 in France on initiation and renewal of B/TST.LRx contains all anonymized medication dispenses prescribed in outpatient care in a representative panel of French retails pharmacies, including data of near 40 million patients. The impact of B/TST initiation and renewal were studied using 2019 as reference and dispense deliveries data of pharmacies with regular flew in order to perform the comparison. B/TST considered were abatacept, anti-TNF, anti-IL6, anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23 or anti-IL23, JAK inhibitors (JAKi) and other classes such as aprelimast, aminosalicylates (AS), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and methotrexate (MTX). A treatment initiated was defined as a treatment not delivered in the past 12 months, and conversely for a treatment renewal. Results were presented as raw one and expressed in percentage of patients having at least one B/TST delivery in each therapeutic classes of interest in 2020 compared to 2019 used as reference year (period from week 12 to week 19 considered and corresponding to the lockdown period in France).During the lockdown period, a decrease in initiation was observed for patients treated with: abatacept (405 in 2019 vs 227 in 2020: -44%, p<0.001), anti-TNF (1156 vs 1058, -31%, p<0.001), anti-IL17 (415 vs 206, -50%, p<0.001), anti-IL12-23 (395 vs 339, -12%, p=0.16), JAKi (289 vs 174, -39%, p=0.006), contrasting with an increase for Tociliumab (117 vs 445, +152%, p=0,01). We found a decrease of 7% (2171 vs 2015, p=0,35), 44% (405 vs 227, p<0.001), 30% (3430 vs 2390, p p<0.001) of AS, aprelimast and MTX initiation, respectively, and an increase of 173% (1708 vs 4671, p=0.11) of HCQ initiation. No decrease for the renewal of B/TST was observedDuring the epidemic’s peak, initiation of AS, MTX, biotherapies (except for tocilizumab), and JAKi dramatically decreased without impacting their renewal. Two treatments were mainly initiated, tocilizumab probably due to a switch from intravenous to subcutaneous injection and HCQ in relation to its presumably effect on COVID-19. Overall, recommendations from scientific societies have been followed.None declared

Keywords: initiation renewal; initiation; tst; renewal; impact covid; targeted synthetic

Journal Title: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.