Objective To assess the impact of different phase-out measures approved by several European governments. Design This is a longitudinal observational study. Settings European countries, from 20 February 2020 to 11… Click to show full abstract
Objective To assess the impact of different phase-out measures approved by several European governments. Design This is a longitudinal observational study. Settings European countries, from 20 February 2020 to 11 May 2020. Participants All European countries that implemented at least one phase-out measure dictated by governments, during the follow-up period. Main outcome New COVID-19 cases, analysed as daily rate by countries. Methods We compared the observed versus the predicted rates of new confirmed cases, hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and deaths by regions in Spain, to assess the accuracy of the proposed generalised estimating equations and hurdle models. Based on these models, we defined and calculated two indices to quantify the impact of the phase-out measures approved in several European countries. Results After 2-month follow-up, we confirmed the good performance of these models for the prediction of the incidence of new confirmed cases, hospital admission, ICU admission and death in a 7-day window. We found that certain phase-out measures implemented in Italy, Spain and Denmark showed moderate impact in daily new confirmed cases. Due to these different phase-out measures, in Italy, the estimated increment of new confirmed cases per 100 000 inhabitants was 4.61, 95% CI (4.42 to 4.80), in Spain 2.58, 95% CI (2.54 to 2.62) and in Denmark 2.55, 95% CI (2.40 to 2.69). Other significant measures applied in other countries had no impact. Conclusion The two indices proposed can be used to quantify the impact of the phase-out measures and to help other countries to make the best decision. Monitoring these phase-out measures over time can minimise the negative effects on citizens.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.