LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of telephone consultation compared to face-to-face consultation in terms of glycaemic control among patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study

Photo from wikipedia

Objective With the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been increasingly deployed in lieu of face-to-face consultations for management of diabetes in primary care. There was a need to evaluate clinical effectiveness… Click to show full abstract

Objective With the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been increasingly deployed in lieu of face-to-face consultations for management of diabetes in primary care. There was a need to evaluate clinical effectiveness of telephone consultations for diabetes management and this study aimed to show whether one-off telephone consultation was inferior or not to face-to-face consultation in terms of glycaemic control among patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Data of all patients with type 2 diabetes who had a chronic disease consultation during the period 9 April 2020–18 September 2020, and met the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria was obtained from the electronic medical records. Setting A primary care clinic in the north-eastern region of Singapore. The clinic’s patient population was representative of Singapore’s population in terms of gender and age. Participants 644 patients with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0% and above, aged 21–80 years old. Interventions Participants either underwent telephone or face-to-face consultation for diabetes management. Outcome measure Mean HbA1c change (∆HbA1c) between preintervention and postintervention. Results Over 4 months, the mean ∆HbA1c was −0.16 percentage points (p.p.) (95% CI −0.26 to –0.07) and −0.11 p.p. (95% CI −0.20 to –0.02) for face-to-face and telephone consultation groups, respectively. The difference in mean ∆HbA1c between the two groups was +0.05 p.p. (95% CI −∞ to 0.16), with the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI less than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 0.5 p.p. (p<0.05). In those with HbA1c≥9%, the difference in mean ∆HbA1c was +0.31 p.p. (95% CI −∞ to 0.79), which exceeded the non-inferiority margin. Conclusion For patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes, one-time telephone consultation was non-inferior to face-to-face consultation in terms of glycaemic control in the short term. However, more studies are required to investigate the long-term effects of telephone consultations and for those with HbA1c≥9%.

Keywords: telephone consultation; face; face face; type diabetes; consultation

Journal Title: BMJ Open
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.