LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

P94 Cardiorespiratory physiology in patients with copd according to blood eosinophilia: data from the erica cohort

Photo by sharonmccutcheon from unsplash

Introduction Blood eosinophils level in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a candidate biomarker for Regulatory qualification as a drug development tool identifying individuals who may benefit from targeted therapies.… Click to show full abstract

Introduction Blood eosinophils level in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a candidate biomarker for Regulatory qualification as a drug development tool identifying individuals who may benefit from targeted therapies. Current evidence focused on association with exacerbations and response to therapy, however the association of eosinophilia with cardiorespiratory physiology has not been determined. Methods The ERICA (Evaluating the Role of Inflammation in Chronic Airway Disease) study is a large multicentre study of patients with COPD.1 Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), carotid intimal thickness (CIMT) and spirometry were measured. Health Status (CAT) was recorded. From the full blood count, both absolute and percentage eosinophil counts were considered. We used previously validated cut offs2 of 0.3 × 109 cells/L and 2% to compare aortic PWV, CIMT and spirometry variables using a Student’s t-test. A multivariate model was then built to examine the effect after adjusting for confounding factors. Results 519 subjects were included in this analysis. Of these, 58% were men, mean (SD) age of 66.9 (7.6) years with a median smoking history of 42 pack years. Mean (SD) resting heart rate was 75 (13)bpm, mean arterial pressure 104 (12) mmHg and percentage predicted FEV152.5 (16.1)%. When comparing high and low eosinophil groups at both 0.3 × 109 cells/L and 2% cut-offs there was no difference in smoking status or pack years, spirometry variables or CAT score. There was no difference in prevalence of ischaemic heart disease, stroke or diabetes. Aortic PWV or CIMT were not different between groups. Multiple regression confirmed this (Table). Abstract P94 Table 1 Cardiorespiratory variables * Absolute eosinophil count Percentage eosinophil count Beta co-efficient 95% CI p-value Beta co-efficient 95% CI p-value Aortic PWV (m/s) 0.23 −1.3 to 1.7 0.77 0.090 −0.29 to 0.47 0.64 CIMT (mm)Diameter rightDiameter left 0.160.17 −0.60 to 0.91−0.56 to 0.89 0.690.65 0.040.05 −0.15 to 0.23−0.13 to 0.23 0.710.59 FEV1 (L) 0.10 −0.11 to 0.51 0.21 0.06 −0.02 to 0.13 0.15 FVC (L) 0.17 −0.29 to 0.64 0.46 0.12 0.01 to 0.23 0.04 * Adjustment for sex, age, MAP, HR, FEV1, FVC, smoking pack years, history of diabetes and peripheral vascular disease Conclusions A phenotype defined by blood eosinophilia does not relate to cardiorespiratory physiological variables in subjects with COPD. References Mohan Det al. Journal of COPD2015. Negewo Net al. Respirology2017.

Keywords: patients copd; cardiorespiratory physiology; physiology; blood; blood eosinophilia

Journal Title: Thorax
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.