LAUSR

We are deeply disappointed that the RCVS has chosen to step outside its remit and make such an ill-considered and misinformed statement regarding complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in general, and homeopathy in particular.1 The RCVS mission statement is ‘Setting, upholding and advancing the educational, ethical and clinical standards of veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses’. In making this statement on CAM the RCVS fails its mission on so many levels, but in particular when one considers ethics. The RCVS failed to consult at all with stakeholders actually involved in CAM, despite representations to be so consulted, before considering and issuing its statement. This failure is contrary to the usual manner in which the RCVS conducts itself. It is commonly accepted that it is not the role of a regulator to seek to influence clinical judgement nor to resolve differences of scientific opinion. The RCVS has stated many times that it does not get involved. Yet the current RCVS Council has seemingly allowed itself to be seduced by a belief-based irresponsible diatribe from a vocal minority into a precedent-setting restriction of the clinical freedoms the profession has …