LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Why the future of rock mass classification systems requires revisiting their empirical past

Photo from wikipedia

Despite recent efforts, digitisation in rock engineering still suffers from the difficulty in standardising and statistically analysing databases that are created by a process of quantification of qualitative assessments. Indeed,… Click to show full abstract

Despite recent efforts, digitisation in rock engineering still suffers from the difficulty in standardising and statistically analysing databases that are created by a process of quantification of qualitative assessments. Indeed, neither digitisation nor digitalisation have to date been used to drive changes to the principles upon which, for example, the geotechnical data collection process is founded, some of which have not changed in several decades. There is an empirical knowledge gap which cannot be bridged by the use of technology alone. In this context, this paper presents the results of what the authors call a rediscovery of rock mass classification systems, and a critical review of their definitions and limitations in helping engineers to integrate these methods and digital acquisition systems. This discussion has significant implications for the use of technology as a tool to directly determine rock mass classification ratings and for the application of machine learning to address rock engineering problems.

Keywords: rock mass; classification systems; rock; mass classification

Journal Title: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.