LAUSR

BACKGROUND Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with cardiopulmonary abnormalities that may increase physiological dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) during exercise. However, studies have not corrected VD/VT for apparatus mechanical dead space (VDM), which may confound the accurate calculation of VD/VT. We evaluated whether calculating physiological dead space with (VD/VTVDM) and without (VD/VT) correcting for VDM impacts the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency during exercise in HFpEF. METHODS 15 HFpEF (age: 69±6y; V̇O2peak: 1.34±0.45L/min) and 12 controls (70±3y; V̇O2peak: 1.70±0.51L/min) were studied. Pulmonary gas exchange and arterial blood gases were analyzed at rest, submaximal (20W for HFpEF and 40W for controls), and peak exercise. VD/VT was calculated as PaCO2-PECO2/PaCO2. VD/VTVDM was calculated as PaCO2-PECO2/PaCO2-VDM/VT. RESULTS VD/VT decreased from rest (HFpEF: 0.54±0.07; controls: 0.32±0.07) to submaximal exercise (HFpEF: 0.46±0.07; controls: 0.25±0.06) in both groups (p<0.05), but remained stable (p>0.05) thereafter to peak exercise (HFpEF: 0.46±0.09; controls: 0.22±0.05). In HFpEF, VD/VTVDM did not change (p=0.58) from rest (0.29±0.07) to submaximal exercise (0.29±0.06), but increased (p=0.02) thereafter to peak exercise (0.33±0.06). In controls, VD/VTVDM remained stable such that no change was observed (p>0.05) from rest (0.17±0.06) to submaximal exercise (0.14±0.06), or thereafter to peak exercise (0.14±0.05). CONCLUSION Calculating physiological dead space with and without a VDM correction yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have impact on the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency in HFpEF. Further investigation is required to uncover the clinical consequences and the mechanism(s) explaining the increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise in HFpEF.