LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Corrigendum to “Noncoercive Perturbed Densely Defined Operators and Application to Parabolic Problems”

Photo by markuswinkler from unsplash

In the article titled “Noncoercive Perturbed Densely De ned Operators and Application to Parabolic Problems” [1], there was an error in eorem 8. e operator L : X ⊇ D(L)… Click to show full abstract

In the article titled “Noncoercive Perturbed Densely De ned Operators and Application to Parabolic Problems” [1], there was an error in eorem 8. e operator L : X ⊇ D(L) → X is assumed to be linear, closed, densely de ned, and monotone. However, it is required to replace this assumption on L by the condition that L : X ⊇ D(L) → X is linear maximal monotone. It is known due to Brèzis (cf. Zeidler [2, eorem 32. L, p.897]) that every linear maximal monotone operator is densely de ned and closed. However, the converse is not generally true unless L is monotone. In addition to conditions on S in eorem 8 in [1], monotonicity assumption on S (with S(0) = 0) is required. e condition ⟨Lx + Sx, x⟩ ≥ −d‖x‖ for all x ∈ D(L) is not required as it is automatically satis ed with d = 0 because of monotonicity of L and S with (L + S)(0) = 0. As a result, eorem 8 in [1] is restated and replaced by eorem 1 as follows.

Keywords: noncoercive perturbed; eorem; application parabolic; parabolic problems; perturbed densely; operators application

Journal Title: Abstract and Applied Analysis
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.