LAUSR

Objective To establish the Omaha System-based intensive care of children with viral encephalitis, compared with the conventional nursing applied in children with severe viral encephalitis for children with clinical symptoms, motor function, the incidence of complications, and the influence of quality of life, to intensive care of children with viral encephalitis way provide certain scientific basis. Methods 62 cases of severe viral encephalitis diagnosed and treated in our hospital from X month 20XX to X month 20XX were randomly divided into 31 cases of intervention group and 31 cases of control group. The control group received routine nursing, and the intervention group added Omaha system on the basis of the control group. The recovery time of clinical symptoms and signs, FMA score, disability rate, quality of life, and satisfaction of family members were compared between the two groups. Results The recovery time of clinical signs in the intervention group was shorter than that in the control group. Motor function was improved in both groups, but the improvement effect in intervention group was higher than that in control group. The quality of life in both groups was improved 1–3 months after discharge, but the improvement effect in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group. The incidence of physical dysfunction and behavioral abnormalities was low in the pregroup, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05), but the difference between language impairment and intellectual impairment was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion Omaha system nursing can significantly reduce the recovery time of clinical signs, improve FMA score, reduce disability rate, and improve the quality of life and family satisfaction of children with severe viral encephalitis.