LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Renoprotective Postoperative Monitoring: What Is the Best Method for Computing Renal Perfusion Pressure? An Observational, Prospective, Multicentre Study

Photo by britishlibrary from unsplash

Background: Low mean arterial pressure (MAP) is a well-known risk factor for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), but probably it is not the sole hemodynamic parameter that can influence the… Click to show full abstract

Background: Low mean arterial pressure (MAP) is a well-known risk factor for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), but probably it is not the sole hemodynamic parameter that can influence the development of renal failure. There are data in cardiac patients supporting the role of renal venous congestion in the development of AKI. The aim of our study was to determine a combination of factors best predicting the development of AKI. Methods: Data were collected prospectively for adult patients admitted after major abdominal surgery to 9 Hungarian intensive care units. Hemodynamic and laboratory parameters were compared in patients with AKI vs. no-AKI at the time of admission. Renal perfusion was computed by different methods from hemodynamic measurements involving MAP, central venous pressure (CVP), intraabdominal pressure (IAP), and mean airway pressures (Pmean). Twelve different, clinically interpretable equations were tested. Statistical evaluation was performed by the Mann-Whitney U test and ROC analysis. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Renal perfusion pressure was significantly lower in all equations. The equations MAP-IAP-Pmean (1-area under the curve [AUC]: 0.796; likelihood ratio [LR]+: 3.520; LR–: 0.337; p < 0.01), MAP-IAP-CVP-Pmean (1-AUC: 0.794; LR+: 2.743; LR–: 0.282; p < 0.01), and MAP-2 × IAP-CVP-Pmean (1-AUC: 0.791; LR+: 4.321; LR–: 0.262; p < 0.001) showed small to moderate effect on AKI but have better performance than severity score systems (SAPS II [AUC: 0.696; LR+: 3.143, LR–: 0.433; p < 0.01], SOFA [AUC: 0.717; LR+: 2.089; LR–: 0.528; p < 0.001]). Conclusion: We found that the best parameter predicting AKI is the MAP-2 × IAP-CVP-Pmean. Further investigation is needed to analyze the role of CVP and Pmean, and to characterize renal venous congestion and tubular pressure more in detail.

Keywords: renal perfusion; cvp pmean; map iap; perfusion pressure; pressure

Journal Title: Nephron
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.