LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Abstract 4140448: Pericardiocentesis Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease : A Nationwide Analysis from the United States

Introduction: Pericardial effusions are common among patients with renal disease, especially those with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This population frequently experiences uremic pericarditis, dialysis-associated pericarditis, and pericardial effusion. The… Click to show full abstract

Introduction: Pericardial effusions are common among patients with renal disease, especially those with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This population frequently experiences uremic pericarditis, dialysis-associated pericarditis, and pericardial effusion. The natural history of pericardial effusions in the context of renal disease is highly variable. Aggressive hemodialysis can lead to resolution in some cases, whereas others may require immediate drainage for optimal management. Despite these clinical observations, there is a paucity of comprehensive literature evaluating the outcomes of pericardiocentesis in patients with CKD. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that pericardiocentesis in CKD patients associated with poor outcomes compared to patients without CKD. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted utilizing a national patient sample database from 2016-2021. Patients who underwent pericardiocentesis were identified using ICD-10 PCS codes. The study compared various demographics and clinical characteristics between patients with or without CKD. Results: A total of 126,834 adults who underwent pericardiocentesis were included, of which 34780(27.4%) patients had CKD, 10, 956 (8.66%) patients had ESRD and 7145 (5.6%) patients were dialysis dependent. Patients with CKD were relatively older and had higher prevalence of comorbidities as shown in the below table. Complications such as cardiac arrest (6.6% vs. 4.35%, p<0.01), cardiogenic shock (13.8% vs. 9.21%, p<0.01), ventricular arrhythmia (7.95% vs. 6.37%, p<0.01), acute kidney injury (41.45% vs. 24.55%, p<0.01), and mortality (12.57% vs. 9.56%, p<0.01) were significantly higher in CKD patients. The length of stay (11.3 vs. 8.6 days, p<0.01) and total hospital charges ($189,799 vs. $153,831, p<0.01) were also greater for CKD patients. Conclusions: Patients with CKD who underwent pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion has significantly higher rates complications, and mortality, along with longer hospital stays and increased healthcare costs . Further research with evaluation of etiology of pericarditis, current medical management, and stratifying patients based on CKD severity and dialysis dependence is required to assess the better outcomes.

Keywords: disease; pericardiocentesis; kidney disease; patients ckd; chronic kidney

Journal Title: Circulation
Year Published: 2024

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.