LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reciprocity in Instant Messaging Conversations.

Photo by jakobowens1 from unsplash

We tested how the introduction and removal of well-defined roles influenced contribution behaviors in instant messaging conversations. Pairs of participants worked on a referential communication task where one participant (the… Click to show full abstract

We tested how the introduction and removal of well-defined roles influenced contribution behaviors in instant messaging conversations. Pairs of participants worked on a referential communication task where one participant (the director) had more information than the other (the matcher). Next, these roles were removed and the participants were allowed to communicate freely. Participants then switched director/matcher roles and the procedure was repeated. On average participants in the director role wrote more than participants in the matcher role during the task. But instead of a balanced conversation during unstructured chat, which might have happened without a task preceding it, during off-task conversation former-matchers, on average, contributed more than former-directors. Results support the hypothesis that speech complementarity leads to efforts to redress imbalance, a process we call reciprocity.

Keywords: messaging conversations; director; reciprocity instant; task; instant messaging

Journal Title: Language and speech
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.