Background To date, only a few data have demonstrated the safety of iodinated contrast media for cerebral angiography. Purpose To assess contrast-related adverse events after cerebral angiography using iobitridol. Material… Click to show full abstract
Background To date, only a few data have demonstrated the safety of iodinated contrast media for cerebral angiography. Purpose To assess contrast-related adverse events after cerebral angiography using iobitridol. Material and Methods A total of 790 patients who underwent cerebral angiography at three tertiary hospitals in the Republic of Korea between November 2017 and October 2018 were prospectively enrolled in this study. We interviewed all patients and recorded their symptoms before they left the interventional clinic after the angiography procedure and during the seven-day follow-up visit. The primary endpoints were acute (within 1 h) and delayed (1 h–7 days) adverse events associated with iobitridol injection. We also visually graded the radiographic density and image quality as secondary endpoints. Results Acute adverse events were more common than delayed adverse events. Most adverse events were either mild (96.5%) or moderate (3.45%). Among the contrast-related adverse events, feeling of warmth (59.1%) and altered taste (17.5%) were the most common acute events, whereas headache (41.9%) and allergic skin reactions (20.0%) were the most common delayed events. All cerebral angiography showed optimal density and good/excellent image quality. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that iobitridol is a safe and effective iodinated contrast medium for use in cerebral angiography.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.