LAUSR

Background: Evidence to support cryoprecipitate for reversal of alteplase-related hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke is limited. Guidelines recommend cryoprecipitate as first line treatment, followed by aminocaproic acid as a conditional recommendation with very low-quality evidence. The purpose of this case series was to describe the use of cryoprecipitate for alteplase-related hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This was an IRB-approved retrospective case series of adults who received cryoprecipitate for an alteplase-related hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke at two comprehensive stroke centers within a large academic medical center. Thromboembolism at 14 days and hemostasis within 24 hours were collected. The outcomes of cryoprecipitate alone vs cryoprecipitate with aminocaproic acid (C + A) were also described. Results: A total of 19 patients were included. Thrombosis occurred in 1/19 (5%) and hemostasis occurred in 4/14 (29%) of evaluable patients. In-hospital mortality was seen in 9/19 (47%) patients. Seventy four percent (14/19) of patients received concomitant blood products other than cryoprecipitate and 63% received a concomitant reversal agent. Thirteen patients received cryoprecipitate alone and six received C + A. Thrombosis was seen in 1/13 (8%) vs 0/6 (0%) and hemostasis occurred in 2/11 (18%) and 2/3 (67%) evaluable cryoprecipitate vs C + A patients respectively. Conclusion: Cryoprecipitate was associated with a low rate of thrombosis and hemostasis for alteplase-associated hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke. There was significant heterogeneity in treatment regimens, including the use of and dosing of adjunctive aminocaproic acid and monitoring of fibrinogen levels.