LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Use of clinical tolerance limits for assessing agreement.

Photo by cytonn_photography from unsplash

In this study, we have further extended the methodology proposed, first, by Lin et al. (2002) and, later, extended by Stevens et al. (2017, 2018), on the coverage probability/probability of… Click to show full abstract

In this study, we have further extended the methodology proposed, first, by Lin et al. (2002) and, later, extended by Stevens et al. (2017, 2018), on the coverage probability/probability of agreement, by relaxing the strong parametric assumptions regarding the distribution of the latent trait and developing inference methods allowing to compute both pointwise and simultaneous confidence bands. The methodology requires repeated measurements by at least one of the two measurement methods and accommodates heteroscedastic measurement errors. It performs often very well even when one has only one measurement by one of the two measurement methods and at least five repeated measurements from the other. It circumvents some of the deficiencies of the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method and provides a more direct assessment of the agreement level.

Keywords: agreement; tolerance limits; methodology; measurement; clinical tolerance; use clinical

Journal Title: Statistical methods in medical research
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.