OBJECTIVE To compare cross-linking (CXL) plus topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconus patients, at 12 months of follow-up. METHODS This was a longitudinal, retrospective… Click to show full abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare cross-linking (CXL) plus topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconus patients, at 12 months of follow-up. METHODS This was a longitudinal, retrospective multi-center study. We included a referred sample of 154 eyes from 149 patients with grade I-III Amsler-Krümeich keratoconus with insufficient corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA). In group 1 (CXL plus t-PRK, 87 eyes), another possible indication for surgery was evidence of progression. Group 2 (ICRS, 67 eyes) included only eyes with paracentral keratoconus (thinnest point at the inferotemporal quadrant) with coincident axes, and evidence of stabilization was required. A subgroup analysis was performed regarding the disease topographic phenotype. At 12 months postoperatively, visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Comparison of the outcomes between CXL plus t-PRK (group 1) and ICRS (group 2) showed similar improvements in CDVA (in group 1, CDVA improved 0.18 logMAR, and in group 2 0.12 logMAR, P = .18) and K2 (-2,45 [6.46] D in group 1 and -2.13 [1.67] D in group 2, P = .34) The improvement in cylinder power was greater in group 2 (-2.37 [2.07] D in group 2 versus -1.18 [2.63] D in group 1, P = .003); group 1 had a higher decrease in Kmax (- 3.26 [3.64] versus-1.74 [2.67], P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Both CXL plus t-PRK and ICRS were equally effective in improving CDVA and topographic parameters in a similar group of keratoconus patients at 12 months.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.