Photo by actuallyjoel from unsplash
In defense of the PACE trial, Petrie and Weinman employ a series of misleading or fallacious argumentation techniques, including circularity, blaming the victim, bait and switch, non-sequitur, setting up a… Click to show full abstract
In defense of the PACE trial, Petrie and Weinman employ a series of misleading or fallacious argumentation techniques, including circularity, blaming the victim, bait and switch, non-sequitur, setting up a straw person, guilt by association, red herring, and the parade of horribles. These are described and explained.
Keywords:
pace trial;
argumentation;
defense pace
Journal Title: Journal of Health Psychology
Year Published: 2017
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Journal Title: Journal of Health Psychology
Year Published: 2017
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!