LAUSR

The opposed-piston two stroke (OP2S) engine shows potential as an alternative engine architecture to the conventional four stroke engine due to its high-power density, thermal efficiency, and versatile airpath management system. Since the pistons of a two-stroke engine do not pump the air into and out of the cylinder like in a four-stroke engine, the selection of the air induction devices and airpath actuators becomes critical to optimize engine performance. Both the pumping losses and the in-cylinder combustion process can be affected by the scavenging process in a two-stroke engine. Therefore, this study compares two different airpath configurations for the same family of OP2S engines and investigates performance metrics like scavenging control, pumping work, net indicated and brake efficiencies, and engine-out emissions associated with each airpath. Data was collected on a 3.2 L, two-cylinder OP2S engine with an electrically assisted turbocharger (EAT) and a 4.9 L displacement, three-cylinder engine with a variable geometry turbocharger (VGT) and a supercharger. The experiments consisted of speed and load sweeps for both engines at the same operating conditions to compare scavenge control in both architectures. For the three-cylinder layout, the SE sweep range was much higher, and the intake pressure could be independently varied with air flowrate, thus providing more flexibility for scavenging control. The supercharger and the VGT usage was optimized based on its efficiency map and thus, this layout had lower pumping losses compared to the EAT. The two-cylinder engine had a higher overall SE as compared to the three-cylinder engine, but the intake pressure and air flowrate could not be decoupled, leading to over scavenging and increased short circuiting of fresh charge into the exhaust.