Objective: While instructional videos are commonly used in surgical education, there is a paucity of data on home laparoscopic box trainers. This pilot study evaluated impacts of augmenting instructional videos… Click to show full abstract
Objective: While instructional videos are commonly used in surgical education, there is a paucity of data on home laparoscopic box trainers. This pilot study evaluated impacts of augmenting instructional videos with these devices. Design: This was a randomized controlled pilot study evaluating laparoscopic surgical performance on the LapSim virtual surgical simulator before and after a 2 week curriculum of instructional videos alone (n = 8, 47.1%) vs videos plus a home laparoscopic box trainer (n = 9, 52.9%). The LapSim recorded mistake number, time, and instrument path length to complete each task. Participants completed surveys about their perceptions of surgery before and after the course. Participants: Preclinical medical students were recruited. Those with extensive surgical experience or did not complete the course were excluded. Results: For the box trainer group vs the videos alone group: mean change in mistakes was −10.0 (standard deviation [SD]:17.1) vs +.5 (SD:21.59) (P = .28); mean change in time was −433.24 (SD:304.67) seconds vs −366.16 (SD:240.10) seconds (P = .62); mean change in instrument path length was −4.27 (SD:4.38) meters vs −3.19 (SD:4.86) meters (P = .64). The box trainer group ranked “I feel as though surgery comes naturally” 1.58 points higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: .85, 2.32; P < .01) and “I am worried about being skilled at surgery” 1.26 points lower (95% CI: 2.29, −.24; P = .02) upon completing the study. The videos alone group reported no significant changes in survey responses. Conclusion: Home laparoscopic box trainers can generate confidence and reduce anxiety regarding surgical fields. This study provides a framework for future larger scale works.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.