BACKGROUND The regenerative potential of the nail bed after trauma remains controversial. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 51 patients who underwent nail bed reconstruction with 2 techniques (direct… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND The regenerative potential of the nail bed after trauma remains controversial. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 51 patients who underwent nail bed reconstruction with 2 techniques (direct flow island flap or a Tranquilli-Leali "Atasoy" flap) due to trauma involving the nail bed complex. These 2 flaps were used to support the loss of distal substance and to allow the regeneration of the nail bed. Outcomes were analyzed for at least 18 months. There were 34 men (66.7%), and the average age was 16.1 years. Most patients (56.9%) had crush injuries. The little (16) and index (14) fingers were the most affected. Twenty-seven were children (range: 4-11) with an average age of 7.4 ± 1.9 years. The middle finger was the most affected (29.2%). RESULTS The outcomes were good to excellent in 41 operated patients (80.4%). Hook nail was absent in 84.3% of the patients. Most patients (98%) did not develop necrosis. Children had an excellent/good outcome rate of 85.2%, while in adults, the rate was 75% of cases (P = .485). CONCLUSION The direct flow island flap is superior in terms of outcome, regardless of age, sex, affected finger, dominant hand, type of trauma, and injury zone. In cases where there was a correct reconstruction of the hyponychium, there was regeneration of the nail bed.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.