LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Wrist Arthroscopy Using the 2R Portal: Is It Safer Than the 1,2 Portal?

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUD The purpose of this study was to compare the 1,2 with a novel 2R portal in terms of proximity to critical structures. METHODS Wrist arthroscopy was performed on 8… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUD The purpose of this study was to compare the 1,2 with a novel 2R portal in terms of proximity to critical structures. METHODS Wrist arthroscopy was performed on 8 fresh frozen cadavers via the 1,2 and 2R portals. External anatomy was then dissected under loupe magnification. The closest distance between the portals and surrounding anatomical structures was measured in millimeters using digital calipers. RESULTS The 1,2 portal was significantly closer to radial artery and first extensor compartment tendons than the 2R portal. The radial artery was on average 1.32 mm from the 1-2 portal and 14.25 mm from the 2R portal. The 2R portal was significantly closer to the second and third extensor compartment tendons. The closest branch of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) was on average 2.04 mm from the 1-2 portal and 7.59 mm from the 2R portal, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS We advocate using the 2R portal preferentially to the 1,2 portal when treating radial sided wrist pathology to decrease the risk of iatrogenic radial artery and SBRN injury.

Keywords: arthroscopy using; using portal; radial artery; wrist arthroscopy; portal portal

Journal Title: Hand
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.