LAUSR

Introduction Critical hand ischemia with advancing gangrene of digits requires urgent intervention to salvage as much tissue as possible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of “palmar arch loop” technique for endovascular management of critical hand ischemia by establishing inline flow to the palmar arch via both radial artery and ulnar artery, in patients with failed antegrade recanalization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series evaluating the efficacy of “palmar arch loop” technique, with retrograde percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the involved radial artery and/or ulnar artery. Material and methods We retrospectively investigated 10 patients (60% female; mean age 42 ± 18 years; mean time of presentation post-acute event 24 ± 11 days) with critical hand ischemia undergoing endovascular intervention using “palmar arch loop” technique at a single center in northern India between April 2017 and March 2019. All patients were followed up at regular intervals (weekly for a month, fortnightly for 3 months, and then at 6 and 12 months) with clinical assessment and SpO2 measurement. Study end points were technical success rate, hand healing, and primary patency rate at one year. Results Causes for critical hand ischemia were iatrogenic injuries due to inadvertent intra-arterial injection in 50% (n = 5) and thromboembolic events in 50% patients (n = 5). Vessels involved were: both radial artery and ulnar artery along with the PA in 50%; radial artery and palmar arch in 30%; ulnar artery and palmar arch in 20%. All of them had total occlusion of the involved vessel (>2/3rd of total length) with occlusion/diffuse disease of palmar arch as well; 70% technical success rate was achieved ensuring inflow to palmar arch via both the arteries with improved flow distally to the common and proper digital arteries. Retrograde percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of radial artery in 50% (n = 5) and ulnar artery in 20% (n = 2) was done successfully by looping the guidewire across the palmar arch; 90% showed subjective improvement in pain with healing of the lesions and/or formation of clear line of demarcation with reversal of pregangrenous changes proximally. Out of the eight patients with gangrene of fingers, three underwent minor amputation of the gangrenous digits and five underwent auto-amputation of the gangrenous tissue with complete healing of the stump. Primary patency rate was 85.7% at one year. There was no access site-related complication or mortality in the follow-up period. Conclusions Endovascular management of critical hand ischemia by “palmar arch loop” technique is an efficient technique to deal with occluded forearm vessels, particularly when antegrade recanalization fails. This technique, with good technical success and patency rates, is potentially a unique tool in the endovascular armamentarium for salvaging hand.