LAUSR

In 2 recent case reports published in the journal, attention has been drawn to the association between an aortopulmonary window and anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary trunk. In the manuscript recently listed as an “online first,” Arvind et al go so far as to suggest that their observation of this combination is “unique.” This seems somewhat of an exaggeration since in the text they cite the earlier report. This report itself acknowledged the previous account provided by Alhadlaq et al, which revealed the presence of at least 11 known cases. The careful analysis provided by the latter authors is the more significant since they also listed several additional instances in which anomalies had been observed of the left coronary artery in the setting of an aortopulmonary window. As Márquez et al also commented in their report “Multiple reports of the association of aortopulmonary window and coronary arteries anomalies are published, but most of them are with an anomalous right coronary artery.” Does this not indicate that the association between the window and coronary arterial anomalies is far from rare? We have already suggested that the association might be more than coincidental, based on our finding of both lesions in autopsied hearts. It is unlikely that any of these investigators would have encountered our initial account, since we were providing a review of our knowledge, at that time, of the development of the coronary arteries. When discussing development, nonetheless, Márquez et al opined that the window itself “is caused by incomplete fusion of the two opposing conotruncal ridges or incomplete development of the conotruncal septum, resulting in an abnormal communication distal to the semilunar valves.” To justify this statement, the authors cited an earlier review provided by the team working at the Herma Heart Center in Milwaukee. As we explained in our own review, the window is better explained on the basis of the failure of closure of the foramen found during development between the proximal edge of the aortopulmonary septum and the distal margin of the cushions that separate the middle and proximal parts of the developing outflow tract. Since publication of our initial review, we have continued our investigation of the development of the coronary arteries. Although still a “work in progress,” our findings show that, when first recognizable, the stems of the major coronary arteries originate from the developing intrapericardial aorta distal to the sinutubular junction. Only with ongoing development do the arteries achieve their definitive positions within the valvar sinuses. It is entirely feasible, therefore, that persistence of the embryonic aortopulmonary foramen, resulting in a postnatal window, also disturbs the appropriate incorporation and formation of the coronary arteries. These more recent findings strengthen our suggestion that the combination of an aortopulmonary window with coronary arterial malformations should be anticipated, rather than considered “extremely rare.” It is certainly not unique. Yours faithfully