LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Evaluation of Platelet Parameters in Children

Photo by diane_soko from unsplash

Introduction: The underlying reason of thrombocytopenia in children should be clarified to initiate effective or to avoid unnecessary treatment. For differential diagnostics the measurement of some relatively new platelet parameters… Click to show full abstract

Introduction: The underlying reason of thrombocytopenia in children should be clarified to initiate effective or to avoid unnecessary treatment. For differential diagnostics the measurement of some relatively new platelet parameters (mean platelet volume - MPV, relative and absolute immature platelet fraction - rIPF and aIPF, plateletcrit - PCT, platelet distribution width - PDW, platelet large cell ratio - P-LCR) may be useful but only limited data are available yet. Aims: We determined reference values for these parameters in healthy children of different age groups and evaluated the parameters in pediatric thrombocytopenic patients. Methods: Reference values were determined in 98 apparently healthy children without any medication (43 girls and 55 boys, mean age: 6.3 years, age range: Results: In infants platelet count (PLT: 330,000±74,000/µl), rIPF (2.5±1.5%) and aIPF (8,300±5,100/µl) were significantly higher compared to toddlers (PLT: 291,000±52,000/µl; rIPF: 1.6±0.9%; aIPF: 4,700±2,900/µl) and schoolchildren (PLT: 276,000±63,000/µl; rIPF: 2.0±1.2%; aIPF: 5,300±2,500/µl). MPV was significantly lower in toddlers (9.9±0.7 fl) than in schoolchildren (10.6±0.8 fl). For the other platelet parameters no age dependency was detected. The rIPF and aIPF correlated with PDW, MPV and P-LCR. All platelet parameters did not show a gender dependency. Patients with acute ITP showed significantly lower platelet counts and higher rIPF values compared to the groups of acute leukemia (PLT: 12,000±12,000/µl vs. 87,000±79,000/µl and rIPF: 23.1±9.5% vs. 7.6±4.5%) and of impaired hematopoiesis (75,000±67,000/µl and 12.6±13.6%). Children with chronic ITP displayed significantly elevated rIPF values in comparison with the acute leukemia group (18.5±12.0% vs. 7.6±4.5%) and a significantly increased MPV compared to leukemia patients (12.6±0.9 fl vs. 9.9±0.9 fl) and children with impaired hematopoiesis (10.4±1.5 fl). For aIPF and the other parameters no significant differences among the groups were detected. Conclusions: Compared to already published pediatric data we detected lower reference values for rIPF and aIPF. In the context of the patient9s individual history and a careful clinical examination, the determination of rIPF might be helpful in the thrombocytopenic child to distinguish acute ITP from acute leukemia and a disorder with impaired hematopoiesis. This hypothesis should be investigated in a prospective setting. The relevance of other platelet parameters remains unclear yet. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Keywords: ripf; platelet parameters; 000 ripf; platelet; ripf aipf; 000 000

Journal Title: Blood
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.