We read with interest the piece by Pattinson and Wanigasekera [1], discussing the clinical implications of the recent trial reported by Currow et al. [2], which demonstrated parity between sertraline… Click to show full abstract
We read with interest the piece by Pattinson and Wanigasekera [1], discussing the clinical implications of the recent trial reported by Currow et al. [2], which demonstrated parity between sertraline and placebo for improving breathlessness intensity. In particular, Pattinson and Wanigasekera [1] noted that differential response expectations can potentially confound outcomes between otherwise balanced intervention versus placebo-controlled groups. Such expectations have clinical implications: the management of response expectations should be examined and potentially harnessed to improve treatment outcomes for patients with chronic breathlessness, as suggested by Similowski and Serresse [3]. Well-designed nonpharmacological interventions can harness treatment responses seen in the placebo arm http://ow.ly/EgoM30o7k1v
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.