LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Classifications of good versus poor outcome following knee arthroplasty should not be defined using arbitrary criteria

Photo from wikipedia

A recently published paper by te Molder and colleagues in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders confirmed prior reports indicating that definitions of good versus poor outcome cutoff scores for relevant knee arthroplasty… Click to show full abstract

A recently published paper by te Molder and colleagues in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders confirmed prior reports indicating that definitions of good versus poor outcome cutoff scores for relevant knee arthroplasty outcomes including pain and function are heterogeneous and that this heterogeneity prevents generalizable inferences. In this Correspondence, we highlight an additional and, in our view, a more important problem with the substantial literature on this topic. There also is high homogeneity in that all studies relied on arbitrarily defined cutoff scores to differentiate good versus poor outcome. We discuss this problem and propose a method to avoid repeating the same problem in future studies designed to group patients into those with good versus those with poor outcome following knee arthroplasty.

Keywords: knee arthroplasty; versus poor; good versus; poor outcome

Journal Title: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.