LAUSR

Background To investigate the preference and perception on intraoral scanning and impression making among dental students. Methods Final-year dental students from the 2019 and 2020 cohorts were invited to complete an online questionnaire via Google-Form. Their preference on the intraoral-scanning/impression making techniques and their perception on these techniques including the ease of defect identification, ease of infection control, need of chairside support, ease to master the technique as a beginner, efficiency in their hands and ease to handle the scanner software (yes/no) were collected. The results were analysed using McNemar tests and binary logistic regression test. All tests were performed at significance level α = 0.05. Results Ninety-seven students participated in this study with a response rate of 96.0 %. Eighty-one students (83.5 %) have tried intraoral scanning on peers. Fifty-three (54.6 %) students preferred intraoral-scanning and were categorized as Pro-scanning group . Forty-four (45.4 %) students either preferred impression-making ( n  = 21) or not sure ( n  = 23) were categorized as Others . More than half of students in both groups felt that intraoral-scanning is easier to identify defect, easier in infection control and require less chairside support. Higher proportion of students in the Pro-scanning group felt that intraoral-scanning requires less chairside support, easier to master as a beginner, more efficient in their hands and they can deal well with the scanner software than that in Others ( P  < 0.05). Regression shown that students preferred a technique that they perceived is more efficient ( P  = 0.000). Conclusions While intraoral scanning has perceived advantages, many students still prefer impression making that works more efficient to them.