LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reader response: Comparative safety and efficacy of combined IVT and MT with direct MT in large vessel occlusion

Photo from archive.org

We support the findings of Goyal et al.,1 which showed that IV thrombolysis pretreatment improves outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. We agree that reasons… Click to show full abstract

We support the findings of Goyal et al.,1 which showed that IV thrombolysis pretreatment improves outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. We agree that reasons may include protection from infarct in new territory (INT) in thrombolysis recipients,2 as suggested in a post hoc analysis of the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) trial.3 We propose that INT should be systematically studied as a secondary outcome in any trials of combined thrombolysis/thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone to further clarify this issue.

Keywords: comparative safety; response comparative; vessel occlusion; large vessel; occlusion; reader response

Journal Title: Neurology
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.