LAUSR

BACKGROUND: Extracranial-to-intracranial (EC–IC) bypass was first described by Yasargil in the 1960s for treatment of symptomatic distal internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) steno-occlusive disease through direct anastomosis. Subsequent bypass trials failed to demonstrate benefit for overall outcomes and stroke rates compared with best medical therapy. However, the procedure remained in the neurosurgeon's armament, with studies showing benefits in select patient populations. With advancements in technology, patient selection has become more comprehensive. OBJECTIVE: To provide a contemporary evaluation of EC–IC bypass from our high-volume cerebrovascular center, focusing on associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent direct EC–IC bypass surgeries for symptomatic distal ICA and/or proximal MCA steno-occlusive disease between April 2015 and September 2019 were identified retrospectively. Medical records were reviewed to collect demographics, clinical presentation, computed tomography perfusion imaging findings, transcranial Doppler results, procedure indication, donor vessel types, anastomosis site, bypass patency, periprocedural complications, postprocedural complications, symptom recrudescence, repeat or new interventions, subjective improvements, and modified Rankin Scale scores. RESULTS: We identified 27 patients who underwent 32 EC–IC bypass procedures. The rate of ipsilateral stroke was 9.4%, with a median follow-up of 8 months (IQR, 4-13 months). Patients experienced a 22.3% improvement in modified Rankin Scale scores, and 70.3% of patients reported subjective improvement and satisfaction at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Direct EC–IC bypass remains a viable option for revascularization in symptomatic patients with distal ICA and/or proximal MCA steno-occlusive disease.