LAUSR

BACKGROUND Treatment decision making is strictly associated with the outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke who show a large core infarct. Medical care alone may result in suboptimal treatment efficacy, and endovascular treatment may be accompanied by safety issues. Whether endovascular treatment is superior to medical care is not well investigated in the clinical studies. AIM To investigate the efficacy of endovascular treatment and drug therapy alone in mild ischemic stroke patients with large infarct cores. METHODS Fifty patients with mild ischemic stroke and 50 patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by anterior large vessel occlusion were selected at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University between January 2021 and December 2021. Patients were divided into an endovascular therapy group and a drug therapy group according to different treatment methods. In the endovascular therapy group, there were 28 patients with minor stroke and 22 patients with large infarct cores. The drug therapy group had 22 patients with minor stroke and 28 patients with large infarct cores. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were collected and compared between the two groups immediately after the operation and 24 h and 7 d after the operation. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) and/or activity of daily living were assessed at hospital discharge. RESULTS There was no significant difference in NIHSS scores between the two groups before the operation (P > 0.05). NIHSS scores were lower in the endovascular therapy group than in the drug therapy group at 24 h and 7 d after the operation and at hospital discharge (all P < 0.05). The incidence of early neurologic deterioration was significantly lower in the endovascular therapy group than in the drug therapy group (P < 0.05). At hospital discharge, the mRS score was lower in the endovascular treatment group than in the drug therapy group, and the activity of daily living score was better in the endovascular treatment group than in the drug therapy group (all P < 0.05). During a follow-up of 3 mo, 17 patients (34.0%) had good prognosis (mRS ≤ 2), 33 patients (66.0%) had poor prognosis (mRS > 2), and 11 patients (22.0%) died. In the medical treatment group, 16 patients (mRS ≤ 2) had good prognosis (32.0%), 34 patients (mRS > 2) had poor prognosis (68.0%), and 14 patients (28.0%) died. There was no significant difference in prognosis and mortality between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Endovascular therapy can improve NIHSS score and mRS score in patients with mild ischemic stroke and large infarct cores. It is suitable for clinical application.