LAUSR

ing the importance of the local memories of guerrilla conflicts in war-torn neighborhoods. One hopes future scholars will continue to examine the legacy of the South’s internal conflicts, for as Frisby aptly points out, while major armies may “determine the outcome of a war, it is the response to an insurgency that often determines the character of the peace” (p. 126). For historians of the South, perhaps the most intriguing chapter in Border Wars is its afterword, in which Benjamin Franklin Cooling lays out how much is left to be studied, acknowledging the limits of the present volume and pointing out needed future work. Topics like the Tullahoma campaign, emancipation in Kentucky, and how Kentucky and Tennessee dealt with the destruction of war remain to be studied. But given the wide variety of subjects this volume does examine, historians of the military conflict in Kentucky and Tennessee will enjoy Border Wars.