LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Response to: “Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state”

Photo by devilcoders from unsplash

Patients in completely locked-in state (CLIS) have no means of communication and present a highly challenging and daunting problem for the neuroscientist [1–3]. Until today, few groups have attempted to… Click to show full abstract

Patients in completely locked-in state (CLIS) have no means of communication and present a highly challenging and daunting problem for the neuroscientist [1–3]. Until today, few groups have attempted to solve this problem, and only some have reported success in advancing the goal of providing a means of communication to patients in CLIS [4–7]. In his commentary, Dr. Spüler raises doubts about all the research efforts towards this goal but primarily about the results published in 2017 by Chaudhary and colleagues. Dr. Spüler bases the commentary on 2 main calculations:

Keywords: state; response questioning; communication; evidence bci; locked state; questioning evidence

Journal Title: PLoS Biology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.