Clements et al. respond to Munday’s claim that his “reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies”. They contend that extreme data reported in… Click to show full abstract
Clements et al. respond to Munday’s claim that his “reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies”. They contend that extreme data reported in early studies authored by Dixson and Munday indeed result in an “extreme” decline effect in this field, and conclude that the decline effect is primarily driven by papers by particular authors.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.