LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

The impact of viability assessment using cardiac MRI and echocardiogram on the outcome of revascularization in patients with multi-vessels coronary artery disease and moderate to severe ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Photo from wikipedia

OBJECTIVES To investigate the influence of viability assessment in the management of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). METHODS This retrospective cohort study included all patients with ICM with moderate to… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVES To investigate the influence of viability assessment in the management of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). METHODS This retrospective cohort study included all patients with ICM with moderate to severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who underwent viability assessment using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiogram as modalities of imaging. In addition, LVEF, modality of choice, and treatment plans were all extracted as main variables from the electronic database. One hundred 6 patients who met the inclusion criteria from December 2014 to December 2019 were included. RESULTS Posttreatment LVEF improved by 5% in the viable group compared to the nonviable group (p=0.016). Regardless of the treatment received, 6 (8.8%) patients in the viable group died due to cardiac causes after an 18-month follow-up period; in contrast, 7 (18.4%) patients died due to cardiac causes in the nonviable group. However, despite that difference, this was not statistically significant (p=0.153). Medical therapy alone was observed in 32 (84.2%) patients in the nonviable group compared to 32 (47.1%) in the viable group (p<0.001). Although the reduction in hospitalization for cardiac reasons was not statistically significant, the viable arm had 50% fewer hospitalizations than the nonviable arm (p=0.051). CONCLUSION Patients with viable myocardium had better outcomes in which LVEF significantly improved posttreatment. Additionally, there was a reduction in the number of hospitalizations for cardiac reasons in the viable group compared to the nonviable group, even though the difference was not statistically significant. However, further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to determine a definite conclusion.

Keywords: ischemic cardiomyopathy; group; assessment using; viability assessment

Journal Title: Saudi medical journal
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.