Parental, F 1 , reciprocal F 1 (RF 1 ), F 2 , reciprocal F 2 (RF 2 ), BC 1 P 1 and BC 1 P 2 generations of… Click to show full abstract
Parental, F 1 , reciprocal F 1 (RF 1 ), F 2 , reciprocal F 2 (RF 2 ), BC 1 P 1 and BC 1 P 2 generations of four crosses involving four cultivars of durum wheat ( Triticum durum Desf.) were evaluated for grain resistance to yellow - berry. Significant differences were reported for F 1 , F 2 and their reciprocals in all crosses. A generation means analysis indicated the inadequacy of additive-dominance model and additive-dominance model considering maternal effects. However, the variation in generation means in the four crosses could be explained by a digenic epistatic model with cytoplasmic effects. Cytoplasmic effects were significant and consistent in all the crosses. Dominance effects and additive × dominance epistasis were more important than additive effects and other epistatic components. The choice of a female parent possessing grain resistance to yellowberry appeared to be decisive in durum wheat breeding for resistance to this serious seed disorder.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.