LAUSR

BACKGROUND Blood culture remains the standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections, but it is difficult to identify bacteria directly and timeliness. The real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has the potential to fill this diagnostic gap. This study intends to explore the sensitivity and specificity of PCR in detecting bloodstream infection pathogens and to compare it with routine blood culture to explore its clinical application value. METHODS A total of 126 patients with bloodstream infections collected from various clinical departments of The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University. The patient's sample was divided into two parts. The one for multiplex PCR detection was performed using the Pathogeno Elite Multiplex PCR kit. Another blood culture was a fully automatic blood culture system from Autobio company. RESULTS Among the 126 patients, a total of 17 pathogens were detected by PCR and blood culture both methods. PCR detected a total of 43 positive samples and 83 negative samples. Five samples were positive with blood culture, and 81 were negative. The negative predictive value of PCR was 0.98, with a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.68. A total of 38 specimens were positive for PCR but negative for blood culture, and 2 samples were positive for blood culture but negative for PCR. The top 5 pathogens with PCR detection were Epstein-Barr virus (27 cases), Human herpes virus 5 (9 cases), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5 cases), Staphylococcus (5 cases), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (4 cases). CONCLUSIONS PCR detection can rapidly identify more pathogens and even multi-pathogen infections. Therefore, PCR testing may improve pathogen detection in patients with suspected bloodstream infections, enabling targeted treatment of patients.