LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of the Genetic Structure betweenIn Situ and Ex Situ Populations of DongxiangWild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.)

In situ and ex situ conservation are two main wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) protection strategies. Few studies have compared the genetic diversity and genetic structure of wild rice between… Click to show full abstract

In situ and ex situ conservation are two main wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) protection strategies. Few studies have compared the genetic diversity and genetic structure of wild rice between ex situ and in situ populations. Thus in this study, 278 individuals collected from three in situ and nine ex situ populations of Dongxiang wild rice (DXWR) were genotyped using 32 microsatellite loci to compare their population genetic structure and genetic diversity. Model-based grouping, neighbor-joining tree, and principal coordinate analyses showed that there were significant differences in the population structure between in situ and ex situ populations. The in situ populations clustered into three major groups, which were in accordance with their geographical distribution (Anjiashan, Zhangtang, and Shuitaoshu). However, the nine ex situ populations of DXWR showed no differences among populations, and there was a high heterozygosity for each individual. In addition, one of the in situ populations (Zhangtang) was not represented in the ex situ conservation garden. Given the above results, we concluded that the germplasm of both in situ and ex situ populations are precious, and that the combination of these two conservation strategies is necessary to protect the germplasm resources of DXWR, but special emphasis should be placed on in situ conservation to better maintain their genetic identities. In addition, it is necessary to recollect genetic resources from in situ populations for ex situ conservation, especially from the Zhangtang population. S. Liu, X. Zheng, L. Feng, J. Wang, T. Gong, X. Liang, L. Qi, L. Su, Y. Ding, R. Xu, W. Qiao, Y. Cheng, L. Zhang, and Q. Yang, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Key Facilities for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081, P.R. China; L. Yu, Institute of Rice Research, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, P.R. China. Received 8 Jan. 2017. Accepted 12 June 2017. *Corresponding author ([email protected], [email protected]). Assigned to Associate Editor Jorge da Silva. Abbreviations: Ae, mean number of alleles per locus; AJ, Anjiashan; AMOVA, analysis of molecular variance; DXWR, Dongxiang wild rice; Fis, fixation index; Fst, gene differentiation index; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity; I, Shannon– Weaver information index; NJ, neighbor-joining; PCA, principal component analysis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Ppl, percentage of polymorphic loci; SSR, simple sequence repeat; ST, Shuitaoshu; TL, Dongtangliangbian; TS, Dongtangshang; TX, Dongtangxia; ZT, Zhangtang. Published in Crop Sci. 57:3075–3084 (2017). doi: 10.2135/cropsci2017.01.0015 © Crop Science Society of America | 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Published August 23, 2017

Keywords: rice; situ; situ situ; genetic structure; situ populations

Journal Title: Crop Science
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.