The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of inflammation response in the middle carpal joints (MCJ) of healthy horses following intra-articular injection of 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine… Click to show full abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of inflammation response in the middle carpal joints (MCJ) of healthy horses following intra-articular injection of 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine or 0.9% saline solution. The right middle carpal joint of 20 horses was injected with 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (GB, n=10) or 5 mL of 2% lidocaine (GL, n=10). The left middle carpal joint of horses was used as a control (5 ml 0.9% saline). Serum and synovial fluid (SF) were aseptically collected before and at predetermined times after each injection. Serum and synovial fluid protein, albumin, transferrin, haptoglobin, ceruloplasmin, α1-antitripsin and α1-acid glycoprotein concentrations were measured by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and compared among treatments. The results were submitted to analysis of variance using the SAS statistical program, and means were compared by the Student-Newman-Keuls test (p<0.05). Both lidocaine and bupivacaine induced serum and SF changes indicative of inflammation, but the magnitude of those changes was more pronounced for lidocaine. Administration of 0.9% saline also induced an inflammatory reaction, but the magnitude of these changes was less pronounced than those caused by GB and GL. The results suggested that bupivacaine is safer than lidocaine for intra-articular injection in horses. Saline solution should not be used as an adjunct to intra-articular injections in horses.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.