LAUSR

Objective To evaluate the rapid diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA (TB-RNA) for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in a large patient sample and to evaluate the difference in TB-RNA diagnostic accuracy in various respiratory specimens. Methods Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear and TB-RNA to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy against final clinical diagnosis. Results Of the 2336 patients ultimately included, 1123 provided 1 sputum specimen each and 1213 provided 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimen each. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 36.2%, 86.4%, 90.6%, 27.3%, and 0.61, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of TB-RNA for the rapid detection of PTB were 57.4%, 99.4%, 99.7%, 39.3%, and 0.78, respectively. When sputum and BALF specimens were used for AFB smear testing, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 44.5%, 81.5%, 87.5%, 33.5%, and 0.63; and 29.2%, 92.7%, 94.8%, 22.5%, and 0.61, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of TB-RNA for the rapid detection of PTB using sputum were 49.6%, 99.3%, 99.5%, 40.4%, and 0.74, respectively; whereas those of TB-RNA determined using BALF were 63.9%, 99.5%, 99.8%, 38.0%, and 0.82, respectively. Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for PTB was moderate and considerably better than that of the AFB smear. The diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for various respiratory specimens differed; the diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for BALF specimens was substantially better than that for sputum samples, and BALF specimens were more suitable for TB-RNA.