Background Inflammation plays a critical role in the development, progression, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of tumours. We compared the usefulness of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) and mGPS… Click to show full abstract
Background Inflammation plays a critical role in the development, progression, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of tumours. We compared the usefulness of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) and mGPS in predicting oncological outcomes in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) who underwent primary surgical tumour resection. Methods Between 2002 and 2018, 144 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. The mean follow-up period was 76 months. Results The disease-specific survival (DSS) at five years was 71.5% in all patients. When patients were divided into three groups according to the HS-mGPS and mGPS, those with a score of 1 or 2 had a poorer DSS than those with a score of 0, respectively. When we compared the survival rate among the 98 patients with both HS-mGPS and mGPS of 0 and 21 patients with HS-mGPS of 1 and mGPS of 0, there was no significant difference in the prognosis. In multivariate analysis, larger tumour size and higher mGPS remained significant. Conclusion mGPS is a reliable system for identifying patients at high risk for death in patients with STSs.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.