LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Is anatomical resection necessary for early hepatocellular carcinoma? A single institution retrospective experience.

Photo from wikipedia

AIM The present study aimed to determine whether anatomical resection was necessary for early hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS A log-rank test or two-stage test was used for univariate analysis. A Cox… Click to show full abstract

AIM The present study aimed to determine whether anatomical resection was necessary for early hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS A log-rank test or two-stage test was used for univariate analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS For patients without microvascular invasion, a resection margin ≥1 cm provided the longest recurrence-free survival time regardless of whether they underwent anatomical resection (p = 0.005) or nonanatomical resection (p = 0.006). For patients with microvascular invasion, anatomical resection combined with a resection margin ≥1 cm provided the longest recurrence-free survival time compared with other treatments (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Anatomical resection was not necessary for patients without microvascular invasion. However, for patients with microvascular invasion, both anatomical resection and a resection margin ≥1 cm were necessary.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; early hepatocellular; resection necessary; necessary early; resection; anatomical resection

Journal Title: Future oncology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.