LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

76-OR: In-Depth Review of Glycemic Control and Glycemic Variability in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Open Source Artificial Pancreas Systems

Photo by mykjohnson from unsplash

Background: Thousands with type 1 diabetes are estimated to be using open source Artificial Pancreas Systems (APS) with commercially available insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors (CGM), and an open source… Click to show full abstract

Background: Thousands with type 1 diabetes are estimated to be using open source Artificial Pancreas Systems (APS) with commercially available insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors (CGM), and an open source control algorithm to process glucose readings and adjust insulin delivery. OpenAPS and similar do-it-yourself (DIY) closed loop systems gained considerable interest in the online diabetes community. Many using DIY closed loop systems have chosen to donate their data to a shared, anonymized data repository called the “OpenAPS Data Commons.” The present study evaluated glycemic control and glycemic variability of CGM readings of 80 DIY closed loop users. Methods: We analyzed 19251 days (53 years) of CGM readings with a mean duration of 134 days per patient (min. 3 days, max. 917 days) after the patient started looping. Results: Mean glucose was 137 ± 20mg/dl and estimated glycated hemogloblin A1c (eA1c) was 6.40 ± 0.70%. Time in target range (70-180mg/dL) was 77.5 ± 10.5%, 4.3% of CGM readings were below 70mg/dL, 1.3% were below 54mg/dL, 18.2% were above 180mg/dL, and 4.1% of CGM readings were above 250mg/dL, respectively. A total of 6474 hypoglycemic events (CGM reading 120 minutes; daytime: 1043 [76.30%]; nighttime: 324 [23.7%]). Coefficient of variation (CV) was 35.5 ± 5.9% (daytime: 35.4%; nighttime: 33.9%) and mean of daily differences (MODD) was 50.1 ± 13.5 mg/dL. Conclusion: Open source AP systems show potential to support stable glycemic control in people with T1D. This is the largest descriptive analysis of open source APS data to date. The results are promising, but open source APS should be investigated in additional detail before a conclusion about their safety and efficacy can be drawn. Disclosure A. Melmer: None. T. Zuger: None. D.M. Lewis: Consultant; Self; Diabeloop SA, Roche Diabetes Care. S.M. Leibrand: Consultant; Self; Diabeloop SA, Roche Diabetes Care. M. Laimer: None.

Keywords: using open; type diabetes; glycemic control; open source; source

Journal Title: Diabetes
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.