LAUSR

Objective To investigate differences in metabolic cost and gross mechanical efficiency of a novel handle-based wheelchair propulsion device and to compare its performance with conventional push-rim propulsion. Design Double-group comparative study between 2 different propulsion methods. Participants Eight paraplegic individuals and 10 non-disabled persons. Methods Participants performed the same exercise using a push-rim device and the novel handle-based device on a wheelchair-based test rig. The exercise consisted of a combined submaximal and maximal test. Power output, oxygen uptake, ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio and heart rate were recorded continuously during the tests. Analysis of variance was performed to determine the effects of group, mode and on power output. Results Submaximal exercise resulted in a higher efficiency for the novel device and significant main effects of propulsion mode on all investigated parameters, except heart rate. On the respiratory exchange ratio, a significant interaction effect was found for both mode and group. The maximal exercise resulted in a higher peak power output and lower peak heart rate during propulsion using the handle-based device. A significant main effect on mode for mean peak power output, ventilation and heart rate was also observed. Conclusion Wheelchair propulsion using the handle-based device resulted in lower physical responses and higher mechanical efficiency, suggesting that this novel design may be well suited for indoor use, thereby offering an attractive alternative to push-rim wheelchairs. LAY ABSTRACT The push-rim is the preferred mode of propulsion for more than 90% of all self-propelled wheelchair users, even though it is the least efficient. Furthermore, push-rim propulsion is highly strenuous for the musculoskeletal system and often leads to severe upper limb injuries. Alternative modes of manual wheelchair propulsion are available (e.g. arm-crank propulsion (handbikes) and lever-propulsion) but most of these are bulky, heavy and mostly suitable for outdoor use. The aim of the current study was to investigate differences in metabolic cost and mechanical efficiency for a novel handle-based and ergonomically optimized device and to compare its performance with conventional push-rim propulsion. Eight paraplegic subjects and 10 non-disabled controls performed exercises at different power resistances. The results show that the performance of the handle-based device is below that of the handbike, but that it out-performs lever-propelled and push-rim wheelchairs, suggesting that this novel design is more suited to indoor use and may therefore be an attractive alternative to push-rims for activities of daily living.