Background: The intracranial migration of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) has been previously described, it is a very rare event, and the mechanisms of this migration have not yet been elucidated.… Click to show full abstract
Background: The intracranial migration of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) has been previously described, it is a very rare event, and the mechanisms of this migration have not yet been elucidated. Case Description: Newborn at 38 weeks of gestation by cesarean section, with congenital hydrocephalus due to Dandy–Walker malformation that required right Frazier VPS placement. At 2-month follow-up, computed tomography of the skull showed cranial migration of VPS and dysfunction. At evaluation, there were signs of systemic infection. External ventricular drainage was placed and an intravenous antibiotic scheme for Gram-positive bacteria was started. After 3 months, cerebrospinal fluid cultures were negative and definitive VPS was decided. Conclusion: Different possible mechanisms have been proposed, such as negative intraventricular pressure, positive intra-abdominal pressure, use of valveless catheters, excessive burr hole size, as well as such as occipital ventricular access, thin cortical mantle, incorrect distal and proximal fixation, short distance between the peritoneum and ventricles, and a possible inflammatory reaction to the catheter material (silicone). A combination of these different mechanisms contributes to proximal shunt migration. Although the placement of a VPS is a procedure well taught since the 1st years of neurosurgical residency, it is not exempt from complications. Although, as was previously stated in this paper, the incidence of a complete cranial VPS migration is extremely rare, and only a few cases are documented, it is still important to report this type of cases and to try to elucidate the possible mechanisms involved.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.