LAUSR

OBJECTIVE Our aim in this study is to evaluate epilepsy classification in children with epilepsy before monitoring (based on information received from the family) and after monitoring (based on video-EEG) by comparing two separate classification systems, namely the 2017 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and Semiological Seizure Classification (SSC) systems. Classifications and methods were compared in terms of simplicity, intelligibility, and applicability during daily outpatient care. PATIENTS AND METHODS  The study was performed with 230 recorded seizures of 173 patients aged between 1 and 18 years who underwent video-EEG monitoring and clinical seizure recordings. Seizure types and video-EEG data of the patients were recorded. Seizures were first classified based on information obtained from the parents of the patients in interviews, recorded as "before video-EEG monitoring classification," and a second characterization, based on video EEG-monitoring, was subsequently recorded as "after video-EEG monitoring classification". The consistency of both seizure classifications was evaluated. RESULTS For both classifications, autonomic seizures were the least congruent seizures (κ=0.27, κ=-0.005). The families generally described the seizures very well; the consistency before and after video-EEG monitoring was good. Focal seizures with impaired awareness were most common in the 2017 ILAE classification (κ=0.6), while for the SSC simple motor seizures were most common (κ=0.84). Among subtypes, clonic-tonic seizures were the most common, and the second most common subtype was dialeptic (κ=0.67). Overall, the harmony between the SSC and ILAE systems was good. The rate of good and excellent coefficients of concordance for both the SSC and 2017 ILAE was determined as 77.8% for the expanded SSC, 48% for the 2017 ILAE, 71.4% for the basic SSC, and 60% for the 2017 ILAE. CONCLUSIONS In practice, it is difficult to determine seizure patterns reliably in cases of childhood epilepsy. Parents, however, can generally describe seizures very well. Although the SSC seems to be superior, both the SSC and 2017 ILAE systems can be applied in daily use. Such classification enables the rise of new concepts and a better understanding of disease groups. The continuing development of classification systems will lead to advancements for patients.